Get connected
Dr. Liam Printer - 'The Motivated Classroom' Educational Consultant, Author, Researcher
  • Home
    • About >
      • Coaching
  • Podcast
    • Episodes 1-40
    • Episodes 41+
    • Programme Notes 1-40
    • Programme Notes 41+
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Workshops
    • Teaching with CI
    • Reading strategies
  • Consultancy
    • Presentations & Workshops
    • TPRS / CI
    • Testimonials
  • Publications
  • Contact

How to measure 'success' in the classroom? Stop laminating and start motivating.

7/1/2019

5 Comments

 
As a teacher, how do you measure ‘success’ in your classroom? Progress? Engagement? Learning? Unfortunately, the standard way to judge or quantify how successful you, your methods or your students are, is through ‘achievement outcomes’ or, more simply, ‘results’. Obviously, it is important that our students are learning, but I fear that the reason we have increasing numbers of students in the UK dropping languages is because we have slipped into a Machiavellian way of looking at language acquisition (and many other subjects) - as long as they are getting the results, then the methods don’t matter. The ‘ends justify the means’ per se.

Drill. Practise. Worksheet. Repeat.

The results will come and everyone is happy, right? The results often do come, at least for those willing to do the tedious practice and conjugation drills, but not everyone is happy. Perhaps the parents are happy when they see the ‘A’ on the results transcript, perhaps even the teacher is happy seeing those wonderful phrases we practised so many times reappear on the exam script, but no, not everyone is happy. The vast majority of students do not like rote learning, drills and practice. The research tells us students are ditching languages because, quite simply, they find it boring. In my own research, 11 years of collecting feedback forms at various stages in the year from students of all ages, backgrounds and contexts, I’m still at under 1% of responses listing grammar worksheets or practice drills as activities they felt helped their learning. They can serve a purpose when used very sparingly. However, in reality, far too many of us fall back on grammar exercises as our ‘go to – keep them quietly working’ activity when our students creativity and passion is dying a slow and painful death by powerpoint boredom.

The problem with focusing on achievement and results is that even when we appear to be ‘successful’, we still have far too many students (and parents) talking about hating French or ‘not being able to speak any Spanish’ even though they studied it for five years. Our subject is ‘language acquisition’ but what most students actually get is a linguistics class on the mechanics of language and grammar, sprinkled with some role-play and practice drills in case someone in the future should ask them any of the very precise questions in our textbooks. I remember going to Germany when I was 15 and had been learning German for three years… and to my shock and horror, even though I knew my lines, I had practised and drilled those role plays, the pesky Germans did not know theirs! Not one person asked me how to get to the post office or to list off all the items in my bedroom.
PictureChristmas card from an ex-student 2018
There seems to be a growing debate between language teachers and researchers about whether we should focus on ‘fluency’ versus ‘accuracy’ or on ‘meaning’ versus ‘form’. Personally, I am in the ‘meaning and fluency’ camp, with a strong belief that ‘accuracy and form’ come later. I am not saying we just ignore errors or never mention the G word (grammar), rather that we don’t make these the number one priority. The focus needs to move away from 'achievement outcomes' and towards 'engagement incomes'. Personally, and I have plenty of first-hand evidence to go along with the research on this, I think we need to ask ourselves the question:
 
Why teach with a focus on accuracy, form, grammar drills and practice when you get pretty much the same 'results', but with a huge increase in motivation, with a Comprehensible Input (CI) based approach?
 
I used to be a 'traditional' grammar, drill and practice language teacher for years. A pretty good one too. I was getting great 'results'. Most students liked my classes and were learning a lot. The 'academic' kids were excelling but others were simply not that interested no matter how hard I tried. I resigned myself to admitting "they just don't really like languages". Wrong. They just didn't find studying the mechanics of language as interesting as I did, like most other teenagers.
 
The switch to ‘Comprehensible Input’ teaching means I now reach all students. Even those who are not that 'into' languages, they still like Spanish and even after the timetable has forced them to drop it to pursue their love of Physics or Economics, they still come to me and speak Spanish, they still say they loved the class. This is what has changed. Grammar and drilling does 'work' for many kids, in terms of it helps them do very well on exams. But CI based classrooms grow a genuine love and interest for the language and the class and... here is the key, they also do really well on the exams.

PictureStudent 1 minute summary feedback 2018
My research focuses on the motivational side of language teaching and learning, and I do wonder why we continue to argue over which methods 'work' the best when we can't see the wood for the trees. We know that both 'methods' can deliver results but only one method is perceived as highly motivating and fun by almost ALL the students and not just some. The one that 'works' the best is not the one with fewer grammatical errors or longer error free iterations or even the one with greater fluency or accuracy. It is the one that keeps students coming back for more, the one that makes students want to go and look up a Spanish song at night, the one that makes them want to try that Spanish phrase with their Colombian piano teacher. When we focus on that part... the motivation part, the accuracy will follow, as you have peaked a desire in that student to go and find out for themselves why it is -o and not -a at the end of that word (if they really want to know!). If both methods get us the same results but one motivates much more than the other, one creates more smiles and laughs from both the teacher and the students, why are we even arguing about this?
 
I'm not making this up either… the limited research around the motivational pull of CI and TPRS storytelling teaching is very strong. The huge volumes of data we have relating to retention and engagement in traditional grammar, drills and practice classroom is also very strong, but strong in the other direction. Students are not motivated by it. Students end up dropping the language and becoming those adults who say "I did German for five years but I was so bad at it, I can't remember a word".
 
Those “I’m so bad at languages” comments that we hear from other adults when we mention our job, those comments are on us. It is not the students’ fault that they are not as enthused by nerdy grammar explanations that most of us, as language teachers and linguists, love. We have control over how we teach in our own classrooms, we can stop the rot and change the way languages are taught in schools.
 
First step: throw out the stack of grammar worksheets, forget all the drills and practice and just talk to the students. Tell them about yourself, your weekend, your fears and passions, tell them stories and ask them questions, real questions about their dreams and desires, do it all in a comprehensible manner focusing on the meaning and not the grammar, and you are on your way to a new vision of ‘real success’. One where you spend less time laminating, and more time motivating.
​
‘Success’ is measured not by how many points a student scores on a test, or by how many grammatical errors there are. ‘Success’ is measured in smiles. This is real success. 

5 Comments
Judith Dubois link
8/1/2019 09:45:28

Great article, Liam! I'm going to steal lots of it for my presentation in Lorient at the end of the month. Thanks!

Reply
Liam Printer link
8/1/2019 10:12:09

Merci Judith! No problem at all, maybe I will get a few more blog readers out of your presentation! I hope it goes well.

Reply
Scott link
8/1/2019 15:53:42

You've hit on many great points!

Reply
Shirel Balaciano
5/2/2019 03:18:50

Hi Liam,
I just stumbled upon your blog recently as I am also teaching at an MYP school in Vancouver, BC and am implementing CI and TPRS in my French classroom. I currently teach French 8 (first year of high school) and French 10 (third year of high school). I started the year with my French 8 students entirely in CI and the main thing I have noticed is their confidence in their own skills. My students know what they know and they know they can use words to make basic sentences. They don't feel the need to use softwares like Google translate because, though they make mistakes, they can understand texts and put sentences together and communicate.
Comparatively, my grade 10 students have only experienced traditional French classes and very much have the mentality of "I don't know anything." They are basically killing time until they can stop taking language classes altogether. We started the year with CI and it was a lot more difficult to get through to them. They were not getting good results (unlike memorizing verb tenses for a test) and were getting frustrated. We really had to have a heart to heart about them finding the motivation to learn and the desire to actually learn the language. I know they are capable but they need to be open-minded and believe in the process. That will lead to their success. It has been slow going but I think I am finally starting to see results. Because they are now aware that they can actually learn the language, and not just pass the class, there is a new energy in the classroom. Now that they are seeing results, they are more motivated to continue on this path and use this strategy. I will make French speakers out of them yet!

Reply
Joe link
22/5/2022 11:28:48

Very crreative post

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Dr. Liam Printer:
    Host of The Motivated Classroom podcast, keynote speaker, presenter, lecturer, language teacher, teacher trainer, educational consultant, published author and basketball coach. 14 years teaching experience in a variety of educational settings. Currently I am the Teaching & Learning Research Lead and Approaches to Learning Coordinator at the International School of Lausanne in Switzerland where I also teach language acquisition.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    May 2022
    August 2021
    December 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    April 2017
    November 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

    Categories

    All
    Agen
    Classroom Management
    Comprehensible Input
    Covid19
    Doctorate
    Feedback
    Ideas
    Inside My Classroom
    Motivation
    Professional Development
    Projects
    Reading Strategies
    Remote Teaching
    Research
    Teaching
    Technology
    TPRS

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photo used under Creative Commons from karenstintz